Monday, November 16, 2009

John Cusack, Superstar: 2012 and the Solar Revelation


The next post-Apocalyptic epic for those burnt out on the 2012 trailer

Seeing that Nineties were the Sixties in reverse, it's strange how much the Naughties feel like the Seventies. We have a deep recession, an President more interested in platitudes than policy, a mass culture obsessed with sports and celebrity and a fashion culture fixated on decadence and 'transgression'. American politics is still fixated on the same old social wedge issues. There's even a new wave of UFO sightings and alien-based films. But it all feels so contrived and ritualized this time around. And we don't have the Cold War as a backdrop anymore, so the new wave of disaster/Apocalypse movies has to resort to natural disaster rather than nuclear holocaust, which doesn't really pack the same thematic punch. It's that much more tragic when we destroy ourselves.

The missus and I were set to see 2012 on Sunday until we realized it was two and half hours long, and grocery-shopping and dinner-making and kid-bathing were more important. I'm not sure I won't simply wait for the DVD- I feel like I've seen the movie already. I'm sure there will be all sorts of juicy syncs to mull over- never mind the presence of John Cusack, Superstar and Amanda 'Nephthys' Peet. But I've never seen a Roland Emmerich movie on the big screen, and any possible synchitude already feels a little too contrived.

Emmerich is certainly fascinated with esoteric themes, though- Stargates, UFOs, alt.history- which is kind of disturbing when you couple that with his fascination with genocide and global destruction. But do I think he has access to any inside knowledge or that his films are part of some insider agenda? It's certainly possible, but I've never seen anything in any of his films that you couldn't read in the 'Speculation' section of your local Barnes & Noble or Borders (Daniel Pinchbeck and Lawrence Joseph are featured in some of the promo vids) or hear about on Coast-to-Coast AM. And Emmerich's politics are generally populist (there's a subplot in 2012 about a conspiracy to send the rich and powerful off-world in a fleet of arks). Typically for Hollywood, he immerses himself in esoterica but mocks people who do the same- Woody Harrelson plays the kooky 'conspiracy theorist' this time around.



Strangely enough, 2012 has the same solar flame theme we saw in Knowing. And this time we saw the old prefab "controversy" routine when Catholic League poobah Bill Donahue got himself some airtime protesting the destruction of Christian landmarks while keeping Islamic ones offscreen. But Emmerich's riposte- that he avoided doing so to avoid getting himself killed- didn't do Muslims any favors, particularly in the wake of Fort Hood. But is there another message being conveyed here?

Knowles' Law has it that whenever a controversy over symbolism erupts in the media it's usually disguising another hidden message altogether. Secret Sun readers have seen how ancient sun-worship symbolism is alive and well in Hollywood, hiding in plain sight. And we've seen Solar symbolism in Christian churches as well. I can only speculate on what it all means, but having the effects of a solar flare destroying the Vatican is certainly fascinating in that context. I'm tempted to chalk it up to the Collective Unconscious, but the prefab controversy makes me wonder.

I've come to consider Solarism a completely different category from paganism or any of the other ancient religions. It's technically henotheistic, but essentially monotheistic. And the ancient Solar cults were generally pretty a pretty serious bunch- phallic, ascetic, militaristic, highly disciplined (and weird, as we saw in the Mithraic Liturgy). It's possible some of them could've survived all of these years underground, but it's more likely that the Solar Mysteries were revived by Type A males more recently, maybe within established fraternities.

Taylor Swift kisses her Solar obelisk Country Music Award

And since ancient Solarism cut across ethnic and national boundaries- the Romans learned Mithraism from pirates from modern-day Turkey- it's something that could gather aggressive male initiates from any faith. Sure it sounds crazy, but what good is an Internet if you can't wildly speculate on it? And all of that Solar symbolism out there isn't creating itself.

Anyhow, if I do break down and see 2012 I will post a review. In the meantime, feel free to post your own.

BONUS FACTOID: The working title of 2012 was Farewell, Atlantis. The Space Shuttle Atlantis is set for takeoff today.

16 comments:

Dynamitrios said...

I stopped "believing" that something desasterous will happen in 2012.

I live a much more happy life now^^

And even if something desastrous happens, ill be glad to play my part no matter waht it is going to be.

And with all this blatant symbolism around me, im aware of oit, but i "just dont look".
Symbols stopped having any power over me.
Thats the trick, turn around and see what YOU see, not what others want you to see.

Very good article once again.
You are and will be one of the good guys. You still have the beatiful curiosity of a child

Justuss2012 said...

a friend of mine saw it and told me the John F. Kennedy aircraft carrier destroys the capitol?

ericswan said...

My Favorite symbols are the "bait and switch", smokescreen, smoke and mirrors, divide and conquer, the race card, babyboomers, and TPTB.

Anonymous said...

http://www.politico.com/click/stories/0911/71_vehicles.html

Obama ride into town in 71 vehicles. I guess as 17 would be far too few, the inverse will do.

B.L.Donnelly said...

We have to take back the symbols that we want to use, otherwise we are at their mercy. The five pointed star for me represents the five elements consoled within man, aligned upwards invoking strength and unity. Everything is a bunch of snow, unless we actively interpret and re-evaluate these symbols. Which is why this site rules!

Dynamitrios said...

Of what good is it, to free yourself but only through THEIR means (reclaiming symbols etc.) Symbolism is THEIR way.
Or redeeming the strawman etc.
If you use THEIR ways, you still are trapped, and no better than THEM.

If you place a hamster from a 20x20x20 cage into a 130x130x130 cage, will it be free?

I want something new, and im going to create it somehow,... its all perception.

Im tired of their song, dont want to hear it NOR sing it anymore.

You can keep your stars and chevrons and symbols, they mean nothing to me.

Anonymous said...

I saw half of it online. It is obviously propaganda to instill fear in the populatioN. This becomes apparent when you watch the movie.

gregchaos said...

Regardless of what has been done with solar worship (the Aztecs originally sacrificed fruit and flowers, not hearts) the really interesting idea here is that all those ancient cultures that fascinate us today, whether Mayan or Egyptian, Celtic or Khmer, recognized our Sun and stars to be conscious beings.

Though James Lovelock has validated the viewpoint of planet Earth as a living being, few consider that the million-times larger, seven layered energetic Sun could also be. The implications are awesome and imbue the recent book titled Sun of gOd, by me, Gregory Sams. It’s Googleable.

Christopher Knowles said...

My interest in the Solar cults and secret societies has always been trying to figure out what they might know- what they might be hiding. I don't have any emotional investment in them one way or the other. As to symbols- the entirety of human communication is symbolic, so it's really hard to say that symbols "belong" to anyone.

The groups operating in semi-secret that worry me are the network of semi-shadowy financial groups that are dismantling our economy and making a mockery of the idea of "free markets." Especially since these firms put political candidates out there like the Bushes, Mitt Romney, etc etc.

Check this interview out: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120391729

Christopher Knowles said...

Greg, your book looks very interesting- I'll definitely check it out. Let me just say that for the record though that the Sun to me is symbolic of a Universal consciousness. In the ancient world the Sun was the main event, but we have a much greater understanding now of the terrifying vastness of the Cosmos. But I have been reading a lot of Acharya S lately which influenced this article.

Thanks to you and everyone who comments. It's always a pleasure to hear what on your minds out there.

SoapFan said...

Hi Chris,

To Gregory Sams, I've always had the "impression" that the Earth and Sun especially were conscious or alive. I also went to the book website a few weeks back when it was posted on another entry. Your work seems fascinating and I am anxious to learn more.

That "impression" of the Sun's consciousness has been even more verified for me from what I've learned here from Chris and comments on the Secret Sun. What I like about Chris' work is his ability to distance himself from the material in order to gain a perspective that deciphers deeper meanings. Jung has to be so proud of him!

But seriously, I began a search for the Source. Now I know it was a search of all the solar mysticism our culture has become immersed in. Chris' work answers that cultural assault on a daily basis.

Chris, again tonight on mainstream media, it was announced that a NASA scientist did a podcast to calm the "fears" from the movie 2012 in which he denies that anything will happen to the Earth in 2012! -just like anonymous wrote above...good call!

Thanks, Chris!

Alan said...

So I'm at work today and see a guy wearing a sweatshirt with a crowned eye of horus on the back. I have to ask him who made it, where he got it and I find the name Bob Dylan written on the front. I said that I don't recall that logo on a CD or anything. He tells me that Dylan uses this logo as a giant backdrop for his stage shows. I expect to run home and find a write-up here on SecretSun and so I type "Bob Dylan" into your search bar. I didn't find the logo there, but instead was reminded of some other Dylan resonators.

Here's the two versions of the logo:

The one I saw:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ksSdBOI1Ppk/RvVrdjH7IOI/AAAAAAAAA5c/6udPJwnfXHY/s400/Dylan+swag+logo.jpg

And the one with Dylan's name mixed in:
http://www.edlis.org/shelf/boblogo.jpg

I defer to you on these matters. What sense do you make of this?

Christopher Knowles said...

Thanks, Soapie- you hit on some topics I'll be covering in the near future...

Alan- I have no earthly idea. Bob Dylan is an enigma wrapped in another enigma. But thanks for the links.

Jolyon said...

Not to directly criticize, but the fact that you have yet to treat yourself to an Emmerich epic on the big screen but you have trotted off to films like Knowing, well.. it kinda makes me wanna go Hmmmm..

Enjoy yourself a bit, Chris - chronic pain, death, taxes and all, only you can make this hell or make it heaven by breaking the spells of those determined to keep you (us) in hell. And that is by viewing their schemes and laughing them into flaccid dreams.

If I could do that with Pan's Labyrinth, I am sure you can do it with 2012 or any sundry big screen fantasy.

Peace and gratitude for your observations - keep on it!

Alec said...

2012 WHAT A LOAD OF RUBBISH.

Our calendar is not even precise for all we know 2012 could of been last year the mayan calender rus out in 2012 like ours runs out every year.

THIS IS ANOTHER MONEY MAKING SCAM

do your research people on real factual websites.

itsolusenz said...

Very informative article, thank you for your suggestions and tips.
Web Designer Web development